On September 29-30 at the 8xav¸£Àûµ¼º½ of Freiburg took place the INDIGO Project third big come-together – the second hybrid type internal annual Conference.
The main purpose of the two-days Conference was to intensively discuss the draft papers in order to realise the peer-review and to provide in-depth feedback for the authors. In order to achieve this aim effectively, all of the draft papers and reports were spread between the participants in advance.
On the first day, the participants presented the draft papers intended as chapters for the final INDIGO Project book. Each draft paper presentation was followed by a commentary provided by the commentator. Afterwards followed feedback from the other participants and broader discussions on the draft paper.
The first panel presented on general framework aspects such as Accountability of Cyber-Delegation in European Union Public Law (Prof. Herwig Hofmann) and Algorithms, Automation and Administrative Procedure at EU Level (Prof. Oriol Mir et al).
The following panels (panel 2 – 4) were composed of the presentations of the draft papers build on previous INDIGO work, included on case studies in the various selected EU policy fields impacted by the automated decision making and automatization: EU Border Control, Regulations by Information & RegTech, Political Advertising, Digital Health Infrastructure, Digital Services and AI Systems in the Single EU Market.
Considering the latest EU legislative developments (AI Act proposal, DSA, DMA, GDPR, etc.), the second day was dedicated for the comparative insights in the national developments of the EU Member States. Of interest were national legislative activities, judiciary practice (case law) and soft law concerning automation in the administrative procedures concerning AI/sophisticated algorithms in public decision making.
First professor Paul Craig presented Model Rules on Impact Assessment of Algorithmic Decision-Making Systems Used by Public Administration.
It was followed by the national reports of Italian (Prof. Diana-Urania Galetta), Spanish (Prof. Eduardo Gamero), Austrian (Prof. Franz Merli), Estonian (Prof. Ivo Pilving) and Swedish (Prof. Jane Reichel) perspectives concerning automation in administrative procedures concerning AI/sophisticated algorithms in public decision making. The presentations of the reports were followed by discussions facilitating the mapping of the tendencies of national legislative, judiciary and soft law responses to the automatization, digitalization and the (semi)automated decision making or AI/sophisticated algorithm use by public administration.
We thank to all the participants for the fruitful and exciting exchange!
Programme
Thursday, 29 September 2022
-
09.00 – 09.15
Welcome and introduction
- Prof. Jens-Peter Schneider, 8xav¸£Àûµ¼º½ of Freiburg (Host & PI)
- Prof. Herwig Hofmann, 8xav¸£Àûµ¼º½ of Luxembourg (Project Leader)
-
09.15 – 11.00
Panel 1 (hybrid)
Chair: Prof. Jens-Peter Schneider, 8xav¸£Àûµ¼º½ of Freiburg
Automated decision making in public law
Prof. Herwig Hofmann, 8xav¸£Àûµ¼º½ of Luxembourg
Comments by Prof. Deirdre Curtin, European 8xav¸£Àûµ¼º½ Institute, Florence
Discussion
Algorithms, automation and administrative procedure at EU level
Prof. Oriol Mir Puigpelat (et al.), Pompeu Fabra 8xav¸£Àûµ¼º½, Barcelona
Comments by Prof. Sofia Ranchordás, 8xav¸£Àûµ¼º½ of Groningen
Discussion
-
11.30 – 13.00
Panel 2 (hybrid)
Chair: Prof. Herwig Hofmann, 8xav¸£Àûµ¼º½ of Luxembourg
Automated decision-making in the EU Border Control Context
Prof. Franziska Boehm (et al.), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
Comments by Dr. Niovi Vavoula, Queen Mary 8xav¸£Àûµ¼º½ of London
Discussion
The Changing Nature of ‘Regulation by Information’ and the Rise of Regulatory Technologies
Prof. Dirk Zetzsche, Dr. Felix Pflücke (et al.), 8xav¸£Àûµ¼º½ of Luxembourg
Comments by Dr. Jannik Woxholth, 8xav¸£Àûµ¼º½ of Luxembourg
Discussion
-
13.00 – 14.30
Lunch break
-
14.30 – 15.30
Panel 3
Chair: Prof. Franziska Boehm, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
Influencing Decision-Making by Targeting Political Advertising
Prof. Päivi Leino-Sandberg (et al.), 8xav¸£Àûµ¼º½ of Helsinki
Comments by Dr. Judith Möller, 8xav¸£Àûµ¼º½ of Amsterdam
Discussion
-
16.00 – 17.45
Panel 4 (hybrid)
Chair: Prof. Oriol Mir Puigpelat, Pompeu Fabra 8xav¸£Àûµ¼º½, Barcelona
A Digital Health Infrastructure for cross-border Governance of communicable diseases
Franka Enderlein, 8xav¸£Àûµ¼º½ of Freiburg
Comments by Dirk Meusel, Unit Health Security, DG for Health and Food Safety, European Commission
Discussion
The new regulatory framework for Digital Services and AI systems in the EU Single Market
Prof. Jens-Peter Schneider (et al.), 8xav¸£Àûµ¼º½ of Freiburg
Comments by Prof. Joris van Hoboken, 8xav¸£Àûµ¼º½ of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Discussion
Friday, 30 September 2022
-
09.45 – 10.45
Panel 6: The Effect of Automated Decision Making Systems on Basic Principles in EU Public Law: A Comparative Perspective – I
Chair: Prof. Herwig Hofmann, 8xav¸£Àûµ¼º½ of Luxembourg
Automated Decision Making Systems in national Administrative Law
Prof. Diana-Urania Galetta, 8xav¸£Àûµ¼º½ of Milan – An Italian Perspective
Prof. Eduardo Gamero Casado, Pablo de Olavide 8xav¸£Àûµ¼º½, Sevilla – A Spanish Perspective
Discussion
-
11.15 – 12.30
Panel 7: The Effect of Automated Decision Making Systems on Basic Principles in EU Public Law: A Comparative Perspective – II
Chair: Prof. Jacques Ziller, 8xav¸£Àûµ¼º½ of Pavia
Automated Decision Making Systems in national Administrative Law
Prof. Franz Merli, 8xav¸£Àûµ¼º½ of Vienna – An Austrian Perspective
Prof. Ivo Pilving, 8xav¸£Àûµ¼º½ of Tartu/Supreme Court of Estonia – An Estonian Perspective
Prof. Jane Reichel, 8xav¸£Àûµ¼º½ of Stockholm – A Swedish Perspective
Discussion
-
13.30 – 12.50
Closing remarks
- Prof. Herwig Hofmann, 8xav¸£Àûµ¼º½ of Luxembourg
- Prof. Jens-Peter Schneider, 8xav¸£Àûµ¼º½ of Freiburg
In partnership with
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grand agreement No 822166.